Some book I’m reading.

“The silence depressed me. It wasn’t the silence of silence. It was my own silence. I knew perfectly well the cars were making a noise, and the people in them and behind the lit windows of the buildings were making a noise, and the river was making a noise, but I couldn’t hear a thing. The city hung in my window, flat as a poster, glittering and blinking, but it might just as well not have been there at all, for the good it did me”

I probably should have read The Bell Jar when I was fifteen. Oh well.

Leave a Comment

Womanizer.

I’m not a fan. Boo, Britney.

Leave a Comment

An ode to middle school.

Today’s B-Side waxed nostologia about the golden days of TRL. Brit-Brit was always my personal fave, and I’m not ashamed to admit it.

Leave a Comment

More TV On the Radio.

My review of TV On the Radio’s Dear Science, was published in today’s Michigan Daily. It was also published and linked to on UWire.

My review was also referenced on the UMich College Dem’s blog as “some no name band is apparently good.” Yaay!

Leave a Comment

Mogwai and Fujiya.

My review of Mogwai’s “The Hawk Is Howling” was published today in The Michigan Daily. The story was also published and linked to on UWire.

Additionally, my review of Fujiya & Miyagi’s “Lightbulbs” was published last Friday. Both albums were pretty medicore. Bleh.

Leave a Comment

Dear Science.

The new TV on the Radio album is so perfect that it’s hard for me to wrap my mind around it. But the fact that I can’t go back to sleep just pisses me off.

Leave a Comment

David Foster Wallace.

I’ve never read Infinite Jest, or anything else by Foster Wallace, but this is incredible. From his 2005 commencement speech at Kenyon.

“Here is just one example of the total wrongness of something I tend to be automatically sure of: everything in my own immediate experience supports my deep belief that I am the absolute center of the universe; the realest, most vivid and important person in existence. We rarely think about this sort of natural, basic self-centeredness because it’s so socially repulsive. But it’s pretty much the same for all of us. It is our default setting, hard-wired into our boards at birth. Think about it: there is no experience you have had that you are not the absolute center of. The world as you experience it is there in front of YOU or behind YOU, to the left or right of YOU, on YOUR TV or YOUR monitor. And so on. Other people’s thoughts and feelings have to be communicated to you somehow, but your own are so immediate, urgent, real.

Please don’t worry that I’m getting ready to lecture you about compassion or other-directedness or all the so-called virtues. This is not a matter of virtue. It’s a matter of my choosing to do the work of somehow altering or getting free of my natural, hard-wired default setting which is to be deeply and literally self-centered and to see and interpret everything through this lens of self. People who can adjust their natural default setting this way are often described as being “well-adjusted”, which I suggest to you is not an accidental term.

Given the triumphant academic setting here, an obvious question is how much of this work of adjusting our default setting involves actual knowledge or intellect. This question gets very tricky. Probably the most dangerous thing about an academic education — least in my own case — is that it enables my tendency to over-intellectualize stuff, to get lost in abstract argument inside my head, instead of simply paying attention to what is going on right in front of me, paying attention to what is going on inside me.

As I’m sure you guys know by now, it is extremely difficult to stay alert and attentive, instead of getting hypnotized by the constant monologue inside your own head (may be happening right now). Twenty years after my own graduation, I have come gradually to understand that the liberal arts cliché about teaching you how to think is actually shorthand for a much deeper, more serious idea: learning how to think really means learning how to exercise some control over how and what you think. It means being conscious and aware enough to choose what you pay attention to and to choose how you construct meaning from experience. Because if you cannot exercise this kind of choice in adult life, you will be totally hosed. Think of the old cliché about quote the mind being an excellent servant but a terrible master.

This, like many clichés, so lame and unexciting on the surface, actually expresses a great and terrible truth. It is not the least bit coincidental that adults who commit suicide with firearms almost always shoot themselves in: the head. They shoot the terrible master. And the truth is that most of these suicides are actually dead long before they pull the trigger.”

RIP.

Leave a Comment

Omg bangs.

Oh, and this one too.

Leave a Comment

White people know what’s best for poor people.

Basically. And funny at 5am.

Leave a Comment

Sarah Palin is not a feminist.

I’m starting to think that McCain’s whole “I’m-not-sexist-’cause-I-nominated-a-former-beauty-queen!” shtick is going to work and he’s going to clinch the presidency. I hope I’m just being cynical. But probably not. Here’s why. Maybe some apathy is in order, herbal or otherwise.

Dodai at Jezebel scoured the internet for any and all references to whether or not Palin is, in fact, a feminist. She isn’t. Here are my two favorite quotes Dodai found, the first from Newsweek and the second from Feministing.

“Conservatives have probably used the word ‘sexist’ more in the past week than they have in the past 50 years. This would all have been entertaining if it were not such rank hypocrisy. These are people who have inveighed against affirmative action, a version of which undoubtedly played a part in this selection. […] The governor has talked about the choice she and her pregnant teenage daughter have made, but would deny other women the right to make their own choices. She talks about fighting the old boys’ network and corrupt politicians, but would turn over the private reproductive decisions of American women to both. […] But she could certainly help move the inevitable tide of women’s rights, the tide that has floated her own boat, by demanding that she be honored with the same tough scrutiny the guys in this race get. Which was, in case these improbable born-again friends of feminism missed it, the entire point of the exercise in the first place.”

- Anna Quindel, Newsweek

“Really, most of the ‘feminism’ talk is coming from conservatives appropriating the language of the movement to push a ridiculously anti-feminist candidate. But what I find even more upsetting is the Palin/feminist talk coming from mainstream outlets who are demonstrating absolutely no knowledge of feminism. Take the Adweek article, for example, which says ‘Palin is a classic third-wave feminist, benefiting from all that came before her in terms of the women’s movement…’ So by this definition, any woman who has benefited from feminism is a feminist. So, all women are feminists? Uh, yeah.”

- Jessica Valenti, Feministing

I have nothing more to contribute, the links say it like it is (for me, at least).

Leave a Comment

« Newer Posts · Older Posts »
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.